How this for return on investment? Direct marketers plan to spend an average of $250,000 on database upgrades this year, and four out of five expect the expenditures to pay for themselves, according to Direct magazine’s 2006 database practices survey. Some 43% feel they will pay for themselves within six months to a year, while another 37% think it will take between one and two years. Only 7% see it requiring more than two years, and 13% anticipate earning back their investments about six months after the upgrade. And why are they investing? Nearly two-thirds expect direct marketing revenue to rise during the remainder of 2006. And that includes all types of firms. Direct surveyed 216 executives. They work for firms with average annual revenue of $119 million.
You’re now reading a newsletter called MarketingROI. Maybe we should call it MarketingROO. For that’s a metric being urged on publishing pros by the Magazine Publishers of America. What is ROO? It’s return on objective. It tracks goals like changes in consumer attitudes, (as measured in awareness, message association, brand favorability and purchase intent). Another key objective is changes in consumer behavior (as documented by metrics like sales, coupon redemption rates, Web site visits, Web advertising clickthroughs, phone responses, amount of store traffic, recommendations to others and saving ads for future reference). One way to measure ROO is through surveys. Affinity’s VISTA Print Effectiveness Tracking Service shows that 50% of all magazine readers took or plan to take an action as a result of exposure to specific ads. But it has its limitations. For one thing, as MPA points out in a paper on accountability, “surveys often rely on consumer intentions—not on actual actions.” And results vary over time, so that the marketer should “track attitude and behavior shifts across several behavior shifts across several time periods to understand changes in what is being measured versus assessing only a single point in time.”