Every time I hear the term “corporate blog,” a chill goes down my spine. To me, blogs represent the worst of everything in writing: Self-indulgence and lack of editing. This is doubly true of company-sponsored blogs: It’s hard to tell a supervisor his/her writing ain’t cutting it.
Furthermore, blogs that are unaffiliated with traditional journalism tend not to hold with the same industry ethics as news publications. Nobody benefits from that: not the readers, who are faced with credibility gaps; not the subjects, who can be irresponsibly portrayed; and not reporters who take their ethics seriously. Talk about dilution of the brand!
So my spine quivered when Direct launched a blog for the Direct Marketing Association’s annual conference in Atlanta. Not because of the above: Our writers know to keep the self-indulgence, if not at a minimum, then entertaining. And the same responsible journalism practices Direct’s reporters bring to the flagship magazine and e-newsletters do, and will continue to, apply.
My concern was twofold: First, would DMA conference attendees find the time during the day to log on periodically and read a blog? And (in keeping with the conference’s Atlanta location) would non-attendees frankly give a damn? Second, would the act of hosting a blog automatically lump us in with the lowest of the form?
A week into our experiment, I’m mollified. Every evening’s edition of Direct Newsline contains the hard news from the show. The blog (http://blog.directmag.com/dma05) combines information with wit, snark and color in a separately marked (and, to my mind, value-enhanced) package. Reaction, both written and verbal, has been both voluminous and positive.
Best of all, posting in a conference-related blog allows our independent voices to be heard. At a time when the DMA has become increasingly invested in producing its own media, this function becomes ever more valuable.
Please read it, and let me know what you think.
To respond to the opinions in this column, please contact e-mail: [email protected]