Best Buy’s recent announcement to drop its $9.99 loyalty program membership fee, one of the worst-kept secrets in the industry for the past six months, is a timely example of a key
element of loyalty program management: the evolution of program benefits and designs.
Companies with existing programs should take
this change as a wake-up call to reevaluate their designs as part of their ongoing effort improve. New
entrants into loyalty marketing should learn from the example and plan their
evolution as a core element of program design.
Evolving existing programs
Great programs have always been open to change. Some of the most productive programs started
very differently than how they look today.
Chico’s Passport program was
completely revamped in 1999. Now the program is core to the women's apparel merchant's multiyear growth spurt. Neiman Marcus’s InCircle has kept a
relatively stable structure for many years, but reinvents its benefits and creative every year to keep the
program fresh.
Every element of a loyalty program should be questioned regularly as the program evolves over time. Enrollment slower than you expected? Sweeten the sign-up benefit. Redemption low? Increase the expiration window. Incremental-revenue impact low? Increase the fund rate. Expenses too high? Decrease physical marketing and shorten the
accrual expiration window.
The key is not to think of any component
as fixed. Everything should be
considered mutable. If your systems and
staff permit, pilot new concepts with test markets or segments. Don’t be
afraid to go ahead and make the changes that adapt your program to your
customers’ needs.
Designing new programs to embrace change
New programs don’t have to be right the first time. This concept is crucial, especially in
today’s market. Many companies think
they need to spend large amounts of time and effort trying to get their program
designs exactly right the first time.
While the program should be well thought out and relevant to its target
audience, designing in flexibility will be far more valuable over the long term
than getting the last 5% right.
A key rule to remember is to avoid overloading the program with documented
benefits. Great programs incorporate
large numbers of behavior-influencing surprises and delights, which work far
better when they are unexpected. So save
a substantial percentage of your overall budget to layer in these promotions
and recognition opportunities, and your overall performance will be far better.
Costs and risks
The largest expense resulting from a program change is usually reprinting the physical materials or mailing a change-of-terms notice to customers. So the next time you have to perform either of these tasks, lessen the pain by switching to e-mail notification and by reducing your print runs.
Another cost is retraining your staff, one that it often overlooked in change management. But because
you’ve been communicating frequently with your frontline staff (right?), getting
a benefit change out to the customer should be straightforward.
A change to the core benefit structure may require a change
to how your accrued liability is managed, and it may require a “buyoff” to your customers to keep them happy. Work
with your accountants on the liability question, far in advance of the
change. Surprising them won’t make them
very happy. Your customers, on the other
hand, will forgive almost anything as long as they receive a short-term benefit
that balances the change. If you are
about to start expiring points, give them plenty of notice and $10 off their
next purchase for their trouble. Up-front communication and a little cash go a long way toward maintaining good
relations.
Loyalty programs are no different from any other
relationship marketing program. Concepts
can be tested, settings adjusted, and creative changed. Maintaining a program of continuous testing
and improvement will pay substantial rewards over the long run.
Michael Greenberg is vice president of marketing for Loyalty Lab,
a San Francisco-based developer of customer loyalty programs for the
retail industry, and writes a monthly column for CHIEF MARKETER.